Agenda 2030: A Guide to its Agenda 21 Origins, Global Governance, and Technocracy

What is Agenda 2030? Who created it, when, and what are its goals? Is there a globalist plan to control all Earth’s resources and its people? Do they plan to keep us confined to zones of habitation, own nothing, eat bugs, and never travel? Read on, read the books, and make up your own mind.

What is Agenda 21?

Agenda 21 is a non-binding action plan that outlines sustainable development goals for the 21st century and was adopted by the United Nations in 1992.

It’s plan that covers a range of issues related to sustainable development, including poverty reduction, environmental protection, sustainable agriculture, and the conservation of biodiversity. The plan’s stated arims are to promote a sustainable and equitable world by balancing economic development with social and environmental concerns.

However, Agenda 21 has been the subject of controversy and criticism by some groups who believe that the plan is part of a larger conspiracy to erode national sovereignty and individual freedoms. Some critics believe that Agenda 21 is a tool for implementing a global government, while others argue that it seeks to undermine private property rights and impose a collectivist ideology on the world.

Agenda 21 is a non-binding document and its implementation is left to individual governments and organizations. The plan has been updated and expanded since its initial adoption in 1992, and the latest version is known as “Agenda 2030,” which was adopted by the United Nations in 2015.

Where was Agenda 21 agreed and who was present?

Agenda 21 was agreed upon at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), which took place in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from June 3-14, 1992. The conference was attended by representatives from 178 countries, as well as non-governmental organizations, scientists, and other experts.

Some of the groups who participated in the conference include:

• The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)
• The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)
• Greenpeace
• Friends of the Earth
• The Sierra Club
• The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
• The World Resources Institute (WRI)
• The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
• The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
• The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
• The United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO)
• The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
• The World Health Organization (WHO)
• The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
• The World Meteorological Organization (WMO)
• The International Labor Organization (ILO)
• The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)

What is Agenda 2030?

Agenda 2030, also known as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), is a plan of action for people, the planet, and prosperity that was adopted by the United Nations in 2015. It builds upon the principles and goals outlined in Agenda 21, but expands the focus to include a more comprehensive set of 17 interrelated and integrated goals, 169 targets, and 232 indicators.

The SDGs aim to end poverty, protect the planet, and ensure prosperity for all. The goals cover a range of issues, including poverty, hunger, health, education, gender equality, clean water and sanitation, affordable and clean energy, decent work and economic growth, innovation and infrastructure, reduced inequalities, sustainable cities and communities, responsible consumption and production, climate action, life below water, life on land, peace, justice and strong institutions, and partnerships for the goals.

The SDGs are designed to be universal, applying to all countries and all people. They are intended to be achieved by 2030 through a collaborative effort involving governments, the private sector, civil society, and other stakeholders.

The SDGs are not legally binding, but they represent a shared vision and commitment by the international community to work together to create a sustainable future for all. The SDGs provide a framework for setting national and local priorities and for measuring progress towards a more sustainable and equitable world.

What are the principles and goals outlined in Agenda 21?

Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action for sustainable development that was adopted by the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. The plan contains 40 chapters that cover a wide range of topics related to sustainable development. Some of the key principles and goals outlined in Agenda 21 include:

1. Integration of environment and development: The plan emphasizes the need for the integration of environmental and economic considerations in decision-making processes to achieve sustainable development.
2. Sustainable consumption and production: Agenda 21 encourages the promotion of sustainable consumption and production patterns to reduce the impact of human activities on the environment.
3. Poverty reduction: The plan recognizes that poverty is a major impediment to sustainable development and sets out strategies for poverty reduction and sustainable development.
4. Public participation: Agenda 21 recognizes that public participation is essential for sustainable development and encourages governments to involve citizens in decision-making processes.
5. Protection of natural resources: The plan emphasizes the need for the sustainable management of natural resources, including water, land, and biodiversity.
6. Energy conservation and renewable energy: Agenda 21 promotes the use of energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy sources to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate climate change.
7. Sustainable transportation: The plan encourages the development of sustainable transportation systems to reduce air pollution and traffic congestion.
8. Education and awareness: Agenda 21 recognizes the importance of education and awareness in promoting sustainable development and calls for the development of education and public awareness programs.

These are just a few of the principles and goals outlined in Agenda 21. The plan covers a wide range of topics related to sustainable development and provides a framework for national and international efforts to achieve a sustainable future.

Why are people suspicious of Agenda 21?

One of the primary concerns is that the plan represents a threat to national sovereignty and individual freedoms. Some critics believe that Agenda 21 is part of a larger conspiracy to create a global government and that the plan aims to erode individual liberties and undermine the authority of national governments.

Another concern is that Agenda 21 is seen as a tool for implementing a collectivist, socialist agenda. Some critics argue that the plan promotes a “green” ideology that is anti-capitalist and seeks to redistribute wealth and resources from the rich to the poor.

Others have criticized Agenda 21 for being too vague and lacking in specific goals and targets. Some critics argue that the plan is open to interpretation and could be used to justify a wide range of policies that may not be in the best interests of all people.

Finally, some people are suspicious of Agenda 21 because of the way it has been promoted and implemented. Some critics believe that the plan has been imposed from the top down, without sufficient input or involvement from local communities and stakeholders.

Who was Rosa Koire?

Rosa Koire (1947-2021) was an American author, speaker, and activist known for her criticism of sustainable development, “Agenda 21,” and related environmental and urban planning policies. She was the founder and executive director of the Post Sustainability Institute, an organization that aimed to raise awareness of what she saw as the dangers of the sustainable development movement.

Koire wrote a book called “Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21” in 2011, which became a popular reference among those who opposed Agenda 21 and other related policies. She argued that these policies were part of a larger plan by international organizations, such as the United Nations, to undermine national sovereignty and individual liberties, and to impose a collectivist, technocratic system on the world.

While Koire’s views were controversial and criticized by some as conspiracy theories, she was considered an influential figure in the anti-sustainable development movement and spoke at numerous conferences and events. She passed away on June 30, 2021, at the age of 74.

What does the World Economic Forum (WEF) have to do with Agenda 2030?

The WEF is not directly involved in the implementation of Agenda 2030, but it has been a strong advocate for the goals and principles of the plan.

The WEF has been actively engaged in promoting sustainable development and has organized various initiatives and programs aimed at advancing the SDGs. For example, the WEF has launched a platform called the “SDG Accelerator,” which helps businesses align their strategies and operations with the SDGs. The WEF has also developed a set of metrics and indicators to measure progress towards the SDGs and has encouraged governments and businesses to adopt these metrics.

In addition to its work on sustainable development, the WEF has also been involved in other areas related to the implementation of Agenda 2030, such as climate change, social inclusion, and technological innovation. The WEF holds an annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, where leaders from various sectors gather to discuss global challenges and opportunities, and to explore solutions to these challenges.

While the WEF is not directly responsible for implementing Agenda 2030, its work on sustainable development and other related issues has contributed to the global effort to achieve the SDGs. 

What is the Club of Rome?

The Club of Rome is a global think tank that was founded in 1968 by a group of scholars, scientists, business leaders, and government officials. The club is known for its influential reports on issues related to the environment, social justice, and economic development. The club’s early work focused on the limits to growth and the consequences of unchecked economic and population growth on the environment and society.

The Club of Rome has produced numerous reports and publications over the years, including the influential book “The Limits to Growth,” which was published in 1972. The book, which was written by a team of researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), used computer modeling to simulate the future of the world economy under different scenarios of resource depletion and population growth. The book argued that exponential economic and population growth on a finite planet would eventually lead to resource depletion, environmental degradation, and social instability.

The Club of Rome continues to work on issues related to sustainable development, climate change, and social justice. The club brings together a diverse group of experts and leaders from different fields and countries to develop innovative solutions to global challenges. The club’s mission is to promote a sustainable and equitable world that benefits both people and the planet.

The club’s membership is by invitation only, and it includes individuals from various backgrounds and sectors, including business, academia, government, and civil society.

Club of Rome Members

While it is not possible to provide a comprehensive list of all current and past members of the Club of Rome, some of the members include:

• Alexander King: Alexander King was a British scientist and founder of the Science Policy Research Unit at the University of Sussex. He co-founded the Club of Rome with Aurelio Peccei and played a leading role in the publication of “The Limits to Growth” report.
• Aurelio Peccei: Aurelio Peccei was an Italian industrialist and the co-founder of the Club of Rome. He played a leading role in the club’s early work on sustainable development and was a vocal advocate for a more balanced and equitable approach to economic growth.
• Donella Meadows: Donella Meadows was an American environmental scientist and author who played a leading role in the development of “The Limits to Growth” report. She was a prominent advocate for sustainable development and worked on a wide range of environmental and social issues throughout her career.
• Dennis Meadows: Dennis Meadows is an American environmental scientist and co-author of “The Limits to Growth” report. He has worked on a wide range of environmental and sustainability issues throughout his career and is a leading advocate for a more sustainable and equitable world.
• Herman Daly: Herman Daly is an American economist and professor emeritus at the University of Maryland. He is a leading advocate for the development of a steady-state economy and has written extensively on the relationship between the economy and the environment.
• Hazel Henderson: Hazel Henderson is a British futurist and author who has written extensively on issues related to sustainable development, green economics, and corporate social responsibility. She is the founder of Ethical Markets Media, a company that promotes sustainable and socially responsible investment.
• Gro Harlem Brundtland: Gro Harlem Brundtland is a Norwegian politician who served as the Prime Minister of Norway three times and as the Director-General of the World Health Organization. She is best known for her leadership in promoting sustainable development and for chairing the United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development, which produced the influential “Brundtland Report” on sustainable development.
• Lester Brown: Lester Brown is an American environmentalist and founder of the Earth Policy Institute. He has written extensively on issues related to food security, renewable energy, and climate change and is a leading advocate for a more sustainable and equitable world.
• Vaclav Havel: Vaclav Havel was a Czech writer and statesman who served as the last President of Czechoslovakia and the first President of the Czech Republic. He was a prominent human rights activist and a leading advocate for democracy and civil society.
• Wangari Maathai: Wangari Maathai was a Kenyan environmental activist and the first African woman to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. She founded the Green Belt Movement, an organization that promotes sustainable development and environmental conservation through tree planting and education.
• Kofi Annan: Kofi Annan was a Ghanaian diplomat and the seventh Secretary-General of the United Nations. He played a leading role in promoting sustainable development, human rights, and international cooperation during his career.
• Muhammad Yunus: Muhammad Yunus is a Bangladeshi economist and social entrepreneur who founded the Grameen Bank, a microfinance organization that provides small loans to poor people, particularly women. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2006 for his work in promoting economic and social development through microfinance.
• Jorgen Randers: Jorgen Randers is a Norwegian economist and professor of climate strategy at BI Norwegian Business School. He co-authored “The Limits to Growth” report and has written extensively on issues related to sustainable development and climate change.
• Ban Ki-moon: Ban Ki-moon is a South Korean diplomat who served as the eighth Secretary-General of the United Nations. He played a leading role inpromoting sustainable development, climate change, and other global challenges during his tenure at the UN.
• Johan Rockstrom: Johan Rockstrom is a Swedish scientist and professor of environmental science at Stockholm University. He is a leading expert on global environmental change and the author of several influential reports on issues related to climate change, biodiversity, and sustainable development.

What were the conclusions of the book, “Limits To Growth” by The Club of Rome

“The Limits to Growth,” published in 1972 by The Club of Rome, was a book that used computer modeling to analyze the potential consequences of continued economic and population growth on a finite planet. The book made several conclusions, including:

1. The Earth has finite resources: The book argued that the planet’s resources, including land, water, and minerals, are finite and that their continued exploitation could lead to depletion and environmental degradation.
2. Exponential growth is not sustainable: The book argued that the exponential growth of the human population and the global economy could not continue indefinitely on a finite planet. The authors used computer modeling to simulate the future of the world economy under different scenarios of resource depletion and population growth, and found that continued growth would eventually lead to collapse.
3. Technology is not a panacea: The book argued that technology alone could not solve the problems associated with resource depletion and environmental degradation. While technology could play a role in mitigating the impacts of growth, it could not replace the need for fundamental changes in the way society operates.
4. Sustainable development is necessary: The book argued that sustainable development, which balances economic, social, and environmental concerns, was necessary to ensure a prosperous and equitable future for all people.

The book was controversial at the time of its publication, and it continues to be the subject of debate today. While some have criticized the book’s methodology and assumptions, others have praised it for its insights into the complex relationships between the economy, the environment, and society. The book has had a significant impact on the environmental movement and on global efforts to promote sustainable development.

Influence of The Club of Rome on Agenda 21

The Club of Rome’s work, including the publication of “The Limits to Growth,” had a significant influence on the development of the concept of sustainable development, which in turn helped to shape the goals of Agenda 21. The concept of sustainable development, which is central to Agenda 21, emerged in the 1980s as a response to growing concerns about environmental degradation, poverty, and social inequality.

“The Limits to Growth” and other publications by the Club of Rome helped to popularize the idea that economic growth and environmental protection are not mutually exclusive, and that a more balanced and sustainable approach to development is necessary to ensure a prosperous and equitable future for all people.

Agenda 21 was adopted by the United Nations in 1992, several years after the publication of “The Limits to Growth,” and it built upon the principles and goals outlined in earlier sustainable development initiatives. While the Club of Rome and its work did not directly shape the specific goals and targets of Agenda 21, the club’s contributions to the development of the concept of sustainable development helped to create a broader understanding of the need for a more balanced and sustainable approach to development.

What’s the connection between Agenda 21/2030 and the Great Reset?

While there are some similarities between the goals of Agenda 21/2030 and the Great Reset, they are not directly connected. The Great Reset is an initiative led by the WEF.  The initiative is not directly affiliated with the United Nations or its sustainable development initiatives.

That being said, both Agenda 21/2030 and the Great Reset share many similar goals and strategies. Both initiatives call for a more balanced and sustainable approach to economic growth, and they promote the importance of social and environmental justice. Both initiatives also emphasize the role of technology and innovation in promoting sustainable development.

In recent years, there has been some discussion and debate about the potential overlap and connections between these initiatives. Some have argued that the Great Reset is part of a broader effort to implement the goals of Agenda 21/2030, while others have criticized the Great Reset as a top-down, elitist initiative that does not adequately involve marginalized communities or address systemic issues of inequality and injustice.

What’s all this about commutarianism?

Commutarianism is a political philosophy that emphasizes the importance of community and social responsibility in shaping public policy. The philosophy is based on the idea that individuals have a responsibility to contribute to the common good and that public policy should be designed to promote the welfare of the community as a whole.

Some critics of Agenda 21, a United Nations sustainable development initiative, have claimed that the initiative is rooted in the principles of communitarianism and that it represents a threat to individual rights and freedoms. These critics argue that Agenda 21 seeks to undermine private property rights, restrict individual freedoms, and promote a more collectivist and authoritarian vision of society.

What does I.C.L.E.I stand for and what is it?

I.C.L.E.I. stands for the “International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives.” It is a global network of local and regional governments committed to sustainable development. The organization was established in 1990 as part of the United Nations’ efforts to promote sustainable development and combat climate change.

I.C.L.E.I. works to promote sustainable urban development by supporting local and regional governments in implementing sustainability policies and programs. The organization provides a platform for cities and regions to share best practices, collaborate on innovative solutions, and engage in international policy discussions related to sustainable development.

Was I.C.L.E.I. set up to implement Agenda 21?

Yes, I.C.L.E.I. was established with the goal of implementing Agenda 21. It was founded as a direct response to Agenda 21 and its mission is to help local governments around the world implement the principles of sustainable development outlined in the plan.

Agenda 21 recognizes the important role that local governments play in promoting its mission, and emphasizes the need for greater cooperation and coordination between local, national, and international entities. I.C.L.E.I. was created to help facilitate this cooperation and provide a platform for local governments to share best practices and work together to implement sustainable development policies and programs.

What is the Delphi Technique?

The Delphi Technique is a method of group communication and decision-making that is designed to elicit the opinions and judgments of a group of experts on a particular topic. The technique was first developed in the 1950s by the RAND Corporation, a U.S. defense think-tank, and it has since been used in a wide range of settings, including business, education, and public policy.

The Delphi Technique typically involves several rounds of questionnaires or surveys, in which participants are asked to provide their opinions and judgments on a particular topic. After each round, the results are compiled and analyzed, and participants are provided with feedback and a summary of the group’s collective opinions. This process is repeated several times, with the aim of arriving at a consensus or agreement on the topic being discussed.

While the Delphi Technique can be an effective way of gathering expert opinions and arriving at a consensus, it is not without its limitations. Critics have raised concerns about the potential for bias or manipulation in the process, and about the possibility that the technique may be used to reinforce existing power dynamics or marginalize certain perspectives.

The origins of the technocracy 

The technocracy movement of the 1930s was a social and political movement that emerged in North America, particularly in the United States and Canada, during the Great Depression. The movement was based on the idea that society should be organized and managed by technical experts, rather than by politicians, businessmen, or other non-technical elites.

The technocrats believed that the Great Depression was caused by a fundamental flaw in the economic and political systems of the time, and that the only way to address this flaw was to replace the existing system with a more rational and scientifically-based one. They proposed the creation of a “technate,” a society organized and managed by technical experts using advanced scientific and technological knowledge.

The technocrats believed that the key to creating a more rational and efficient society was the use of advanced technologies, such as automation, to eliminate waste and inefficiency. They argued that this would free people from menial labor and allow them to pursue more fulfilling and creative activities.

The technocracy movement gained a significant following during the 1930s, particularly among scientists, engineers, and other technical experts. However, it also faced significant opposition from those who viewed it as a threat to democratic values and individual rights. Ultimately, the movement declined in popularity in the 1940s, as the focus of society shifted towards the war effort and post-war reconstruction.

While the technocracy movement of the 1930s did not succeed in achieving its goals, it did contribute to the development of new ideas and perspectives about the role of technology and expertise in society. Some of these ideas have continued to influence discussions about the future of society, including debates about the potential impacts of automation, artificial intelligence, and other emerging technologies.

New Economic Order vs New World Order

The Trilateral Commission, a non-governmental organization founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller and other influential leaders, proposed the concept of a “New International Economic Order” (NIEO) that would promote greater economic cooperation and development between developed and developing countries. The NIEO would have emphasized the role of international organizations and institutions in promoting economic growth and development, and it would have sought to address the disparities and imbalances in the global economic system.

The concept of a “New World Order” (NWO) is a more recent term that has been used by some individuals and groups to refer to a hypothetical global government or power structure that would replace the existing nation-state system. The term has been associated with theories and fears of a global authoritarian regime that would infringe on individual rights and freedoms.

While there is no direct connection between the NIEO proposed by the Trilateral Commission in 1973 and the NWO as envisioned by some today, some have drawn connections between these two concepts. Some theorists have suggested that the Trilateral Commission, along with other globalist organizations such as the United Nations and the World Economic Forum, are working towards the establishment of a global government or power structure that would infringe on individual rights and freedoms.

Patrick Wood “Technocracy Rising”

“Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation” is a book written by Patrick Wood, a journalist and author who is critical of the concept of technocracy and its potential implications for society. The book presents a detailed analysis of the history, philosophy, and goals of the technocracy movement, and argues that it poses a threat to individual rights, freedom, and democracy.

In the book, Wood defines technocracy as “the science of social engineering,” and argues that it seeks to replace the existing political and economic systems with a new system of governance that is based on scientific and technical expertise. He contends that this system would be managed by a small group of technocrats who would use advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence and big data, to control and manipulate society.

According to Wood, the technocracy movement has its roots in the early 20th century, when a group of scientists and engineers began to promote the idea of a society governed by technical experts. He argues that the movement gained momentum during the Great Depression of the 1930s, when many people became disillusioned with the existing political and economic systems and looked for new solutions to address the social and economic challenges of the time.

Wood goes on to argue that the modern-day technocracy movement is being driven by a small group of elite individuals and organizations, who seek to consolidate power and control through the use of advanced technologies. He contends that this movement poses a threat to individual rights and freedoms, and that it represents a new form of authoritarianism that is not accountable to the people.

Overall, “Technocracy Rising” presents a critical perspective on the concept of technocracy and its potential implications for society. The book argues that the technocracy movement represents a threat to democracy and individual freedom, and that it should be viewed with skepticism and caution.